Joined
·
64 Posts
I mentioned some of this in a post under another thread, but since doing a test drive today thought I'd elaborate for those who are on the fence.
My plan for 2015 was to replace my 2000 Civic (224k) in the Fall with a 2016 CR-V. And when it comes to buying things, I'm a bit of a research freak and I'll often spend far too much time scouring forums, looking out for fake reviews on Amazon, etc. Therefore I would skip the 2015 CR-V and see if the 2016 fixed the vibration issues.
But my car entered a rapid decline in the last few weeks. CEL light went on, indicating bad O2 sensor. I didn't replace it, and the light went off a week later. Then I stalled out on the way home from work. Got it towed, had to spend a few hundred to replace coils. Seemed OK, then CEL came on again. Now it's O2 sensor and catalytic converter efficiency.
So I'm at the incredibly stressful situation of needing either a new car (that might not be ideal since there isn't long-term HR-V experience) now, or spend a fair amount of money to try and keep my Civic going. Before the Winter it would need a major tuneup, new tires, etc.
I somewhat disregarded the HR-V after the initial reviews came out, due to the complaints about power and the touch controls. Fast forward to today, and with my limited choices I decided to test drive an HR-V.
Firstly I wanted an EX-L, based on my experience with my girlfriend's CR-V. I definitely wanted the heated mirrors, and heated seats would be nice. But these are also on the EX level on the HR-V, and it's a $2600 or so premium for the leather, the navigation (I have an iPhone), the automatic dim mirror (neat, but I've never had one) and the roof rails. Well, $2600 would also replace my dilapidated sofa.. so I tested an EX.
I find that reading car reviews - be they from expert sites, friends, posts in message boards - is a treacherous path. We're expected to base our $20K plus, multi-year financial decision on a few paragraphs? And especially in the HR-V case, there's no long-term reliability available.
I'll skip over the stuff that's already been established as positive - roomy interior for its size, flexible seats, comfortable, etc. (I found the cloth seats quite comfortable, even after sitting in the EX-L)
To address the negative:
Power - nope, it's not a sports car. I didn't floor it in the test drive, but I drove it like I drive my Civic (because that's what I know), and it was comparable. Certainly not as powerful as the gf's CR-V. But it maneuvered quite well, and testing the turning radius seemed quite good.
Touch interface for climate controls - that's a tough one. With the analog buttons/knobs in the Civic I can adjust things while being blindfolded. But how much of that is because they are analog - or because 15 years of driving that car, my muscle memory just knows where they are? Probably a bit of both. I think the new thinking is, use the "auto" mode and eliminate the need for messing with buttons. Will that work in practice..?
Touch interface for audio - I didn't get to mess with this much and being a tech geek, a short test drive wouldn't have sufficed for a full exploration. 90% of my audio behavior is: Get in car and connect iPhone and listen to music or podcasts. Only interaction with radio is for input and volume. This would need further testing, and I'm hoping CarPlay comes in a firmware update.
Storage - I do think the door pockets and the console could be more generous. But what's my reality check? My Civic door pockets contain - expired coupons, some receipts, a microfiber cloth that needs washing. The console has my current iPhone charging cable, and some old cables, and a bunch of crinkled receipts. So there's not much to begin with, and I don't have kids so I can't comment on the need for space. BUT I do agree that they could have thrown in the sunglasses storage near the map lights. :|
So my test drive comes to an end. Well, I'm picking it up on Saturday! AWD EX, the metallic gray color. I added the moonroof visor, car mats & splash guards, cargo cover. My point of writing all of this stuff is for folks who are on the fence - I think it's important to match your expectations with what the reviews say. But my general rationale was:
- My car cost less than a CR-V.
- It's brand-new and under warranty.
- There's the stress of a new car payment, but no more stress of breaking down.
- I have lots of new features to look forward to - cameras, keyless entry, flexible seating/storage, modern safety, Siri eyes free, etc.
- That new car smell!
I'll post back more details after I've driven it a few days. Good luck folks!
My plan for 2015 was to replace my 2000 Civic (224k) in the Fall with a 2016 CR-V. And when it comes to buying things, I'm a bit of a research freak and I'll often spend far too much time scouring forums, looking out for fake reviews on Amazon, etc. Therefore I would skip the 2015 CR-V and see if the 2016 fixed the vibration issues.
But my car entered a rapid decline in the last few weeks. CEL light went on, indicating bad O2 sensor. I didn't replace it, and the light went off a week later. Then I stalled out on the way home from work. Got it towed, had to spend a few hundred to replace coils. Seemed OK, then CEL came on again. Now it's O2 sensor and catalytic converter efficiency.
So I'm at the incredibly stressful situation of needing either a new car (that might not be ideal since there isn't long-term HR-V experience) now, or spend a fair amount of money to try and keep my Civic going. Before the Winter it would need a major tuneup, new tires, etc.
I somewhat disregarded the HR-V after the initial reviews came out, due to the complaints about power and the touch controls. Fast forward to today, and with my limited choices I decided to test drive an HR-V.
Firstly I wanted an EX-L, based on my experience with my girlfriend's CR-V. I definitely wanted the heated mirrors, and heated seats would be nice. But these are also on the EX level on the HR-V, and it's a $2600 or so premium for the leather, the navigation (I have an iPhone), the automatic dim mirror (neat, but I've never had one) and the roof rails. Well, $2600 would also replace my dilapidated sofa.. so I tested an EX.
I find that reading car reviews - be they from expert sites, friends, posts in message boards - is a treacherous path. We're expected to base our $20K plus, multi-year financial decision on a few paragraphs? And especially in the HR-V case, there's no long-term reliability available.
I'll skip over the stuff that's already been established as positive - roomy interior for its size, flexible seats, comfortable, etc. (I found the cloth seats quite comfortable, even after sitting in the EX-L)
To address the negative:
Power - nope, it's not a sports car. I didn't floor it in the test drive, but I drove it like I drive my Civic (because that's what I know), and it was comparable. Certainly not as powerful as the gf's CR-V. But it maneuvered quite well, and testing the turning radius seemed quite good.
Touch interface for climate controls - that's a tough one. With the analog buttons/knobs in the Civic I can adjust things while being blindfolded. But how much of that is because they are analog - or because 15 years of driving that car, my muscle memory just knows where they are? Probably a bit of both. I think the new thinking is, use the "auto" mode and eliminate the need for messing with buttons. Will that work in practice..?
Touch interface for audio - I didn't get to mess with this much and being a tech geek, a short test drive wouldn't have sufficed for a full exploration. 90% of my audio behavior is: Get in car and connect iPhone and listen to music or podcasts. Only interaction with radio is for input and volume. This would need further testing, and I'm hoping CarPlay comes in a firmware update.
Storage - I do think the door pockets and the console could be more generous. But what's my reality check? My Civic door pockets contain - expired coupons, some receipts, a microfiber cloth that needs washing. The console has my current iPhone charging cable, and some old cables, and a bunch of crinkled receipts. So there's not much to begin with, and I don't have kids so I can't comment on the need for space. BUT I do agree that they could have thrown in the sunglasses storage near the map lights. :|
So my test drive comes to an end. Well, I'm picking it up on Saturday! AWD EX, the metallic gray color. I added the moonroof visor, car mats & splash guards, cargo cover. My point of writing all of this stuff is for folks who are on the fence - I think it's important to match your expectations with what the reviews say. But my general rationale was:
- My car cost less than a CR-V.
- It's brand-new and under warranty.
- There's the stress of a new car payment, but no more stress of breaking down.
- I have lots of new features to look forward to - cameras, keyless entry, flexible seating/storage, modern safety, Siri eyes free, etc.
- That new car smell!
I'll post back more details after I've driven it a few days. Good luck folks!